Multiclass Image Classification Using Dense Neural Networks
Build a dense neural network with TensorFlow and Keras to classify handwritten digits from the MNIST dataset, achieving 98%+ test accuracy.
August 14, 2021 · 3 min read · By Kshitiz Regmi
Multiclass image classification categorizes an image into one of three or more classes. This tutorial demonstrates the concept using the MNIST handwritten digits dataset — 10 output classes (digits 0–9), 70,000 total images.
The MNIST Dataset
MNIST is the canonical benchmark for getting started with image classification. Each image is 28×28 pixels, grayscale, containing a single handwritten digit.
import tensorflow as tf
from tensorflow import keras
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Load dataset
(X_train, y_train), (X_test, y_test) = keras.datasets.mnist.load_data()
print(f"Training: {X_train.shape}") # (60000, 28, 28)
print(f"Test: {X_test.shape}") # (10000, 28, 28)
print(f"Classes: {sorted(set(y_train))}") # [0, 1, 2, ..., 9]
# Visualize samples
fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 5, figsize=(12, 3))
for i, ax in enumerate(axes):
ax.imshow(X_train[i], cmap='gray')
ax.set_title(f"Label: {y_train[i]}")
ax.axis('off')
plt.show()

Preprocessing
Pixel values range 0–255. Normalize to [0, 1] for stable gradient descent, then flatten the 28×28 grid into a 784-element vector for Dense layers:
# Normalize
X_train = X_train.astype("float32") / 255.0
X_test = X_test.astype("float32") / 255.0
# Flatten 28×28 → 784
X_train = X_train.reshape(-1, 784)
X_test = X_test.reshape(-1, 784)
print(X_train.shape) # (60000, 784)
Building the Dense Neural Network
model = keras.Sequential([
keras.layers.Dense(512, activation='relu', input_shape=(784,)),
keras.layers.Dropout(0.2),
keras.layers.Dense(256, activation='relu'),
keras.layers.Dropout(0.2),
keras.layers.Dense(10, activation='softmax'), # 10 output classes
])
model.compile(
optimizer='adam',
loss='sparse_categorical_crossentropy',
metrics=['accuracy']
)
model.summary()
Model: "sequential"
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type) Output Shape Param #
=================================================================
dense (Dense) (None, 512) 401,920
dropout (Dropout) (None, 512) 0
dense_1 (Dense) (None, 256) 131,328
dropout_1 (Dropout) (None, 256) 0
dense_2 (Dense) (None, 10) 2,570
=================================================================
Total params: 535,818
Architecture decisions:
- ReLU activation: avoids vanishing gradients in hidden layers, fast to compute
- Dropout (20%): randomly deactivates neurons during training — a strong regularizer
- Softmax output: converts raw logits into class probabilities summing to 1
- sparse_categorical_crossentropy: for integer class labels (no one-hot encoding needed)
Training
history = model.fit(
X_train, y_train,
epochs=10,
batch_size=64,
validation_split=0.1,
verbose=1
)
Epoch 1/10 — loss: 0.2412, accuracy: 0.9282, val_accuracy: 0.9748
Epoch 5/10 — loss: 0.0823, accuracy: 0.9742, val_accuracy: 0.9791
Epoch 10/10 — loss: 0.0412, accuracy: 0.9872, val_accuracy: 0.9815
Evaluation
test_loss, test_accuracy = model.evaluate(X_test, y_test, verbose=0)
print(f"Test accuracy: {test_accuracy:.4f}") # 0.9803
98.03% test accuracy with a simple 2-hidden-layer DNN in just 10 epochs.
Detailed Classification Report
from sklearn.metrics import classification_report
y_pred = np.argmax(model.predict(X_test), axis=1)
print(classification_report(y_test, y_pred))
precision recall f1-score support
0 0.99 0.99 0.99 980
1 0.99 0.99 0.99 1135
2 0.98 0.98 0.98 1032
3 0.98 0.98 0.98 1010
4 0.98 0.98 0.98 982
5 0.98 0.97 0.97 892
6 0.98 0.99 0.98 958
7 0.98 0.98 0.98 1028
8 0.97 0.97 0.97 974
9 0.98 0.97 0.97 1009
accuracy 0.98 10000
Balanced performance across all 10 digits — no class is significantly harder to classify.
Visualizing Predictions
predictions = model.predict(X_test[:10])
fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, 5, figsize=(12, 5))
for i, ax in enumerate(axes.flat):
ax.imshow(X_test[i].reshape(28, 28), cmap='gray')
pred = np.argmax(predictions[i])
conf = predictions[i][pred]
color = 'green' if pred == y_test[i] else 'red'
ax.set_title(f"Pred: {pred} ({conf:.0%})", color=color)
ax.axis('off')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
Plotting the Loss Curve
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 4))
plt.plot(history.history['accuracy'], label='Train Accuracy')
plt.plot(history.history['val_accuracy'], label='Val Accuracy')
plt.xlabel('Epoch')
plt.ylabel('Accuracy')
plt.legend()
plt.title('Training vs Validation Accuracy')
plt.show()
Key Takeaways
- Dense networks work well for small, flat images like MNIST. For complex, high-resolution images, CNNs are far superior.
- Softmax + sparse_categorical_crossentropy is the standard recipe for multiclass classification.
- Dropout is a simple but effective regularizer — often all you need for small datasets.
- 98% test accuracy on MNIST is achievable with a basic DNN; CNNs push this to 99.7%+.
- Flatten first when using Dense layers on image data — preserve spatial structure only with Conv2D.
Next Steps
To go further:
- Replace Dense layers with
Conv2D+MaxPooling2D— expect 99%+ accuracy - Apply to a harder dataset: CIFAR-10 or Fashion-MNIST
- Use data augmentation (
ImageDataGenerator) to improve generalization